#16553: Clean IncidenceStructure
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.3
Component: combinatorial | Resolution:
designs | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, | Work issues:
Vincent Delecroix | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | dffcc4a8118a8bc5d9dfa6c1ab1aabe7aaaaa25a
Branch: public/16553v2 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
I would say that the best is to sort the input even when `copy=False`,
what do you think ? With a warning in the documentation of the `copy`
argument of course, saying that the list/blocks will be reordered (and
that the user should not touch that) ?...
This being said, the way equality is written it will still return false
negatives as `[1,2,3] != (1,2,3)` ...
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16553#comment:113>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
