#12212: Colormap for implicit_plot3d and parametric_plot3d
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  niles              |        Owner:  jason, was
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  graphics           |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  colormap, plot     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Joris              |    Reviewers:  Frédéric Chapoton,
  Vankerschaver, Frédéric Chapoton   |  Niles Johnson
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:  u/chapoton/12212   |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                     |  0ae10f534826c0addaf4d957bf7c0586ba0a88c4
                                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > I think I was unclear -- sorry.  As I understand it, the code here isn't
 backward incompatible.  What I meant is that the uniform interface I
 envision probably isn't compatible with the current interface.  So the
 idea to release now, fix later (which I generally support!) would mean
 that we can't "fix" until after a year of deprecation.
 >
 > And I think this is about more than interface -- I think the code may
 have to be reorganized, with some methods moved to different classes, and
 there would need to be deprecation for that as well.
 >
 > I'm really frustrated about this too -- I'd hate to see this rot for
 another 3 years -- but I just can't convince myself it's good to release
 this as is.  Do you disagree?
 I guess I'm not clear about what would need to be deprecated.  Remember,
 it's only user-visible things that would need this.  If it's backend
 stuff... Maybe I just need more explicit detail about what your proposed
 reorganization would imply for the user interface.   texture_map.py seems
 okay, it's perhaps mainly the `colordata` tuple you are concerned with?  I
 haven't thought very deeply at all about this, I know your experience with
 Tachyon has given you a lot of chances to do so.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/12212#comment:65>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to