#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | e83553e295bc8748735571fd050086d8d59b7ab3
u/jcampbell/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vinceknight):
Replying to [comment:7 kcrisman]:
> Does this depend on #16466? I'm not sure why it's showing a red branch
(doesn't apply cleanly).
Hi Karl, this ticket does not at all depend on #16466, the code in here is
just a basic implementation of the Gale-Shapley algorithm. #16466 is for
#16333, although in fact it's only for a specific optional algorithm in
#16333 Not to sure what the red branch means?
This branch (#16331) is self contained (unless we messed up with
something).
(Freaky that you got back in touch today as I've just written a blog post
trying to encourage reviewers for this particular ticket :)).
Please let me know if there's anything I can help with.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
