#16577: Make matrix.permute_rows and friends accept permutations of 0..n-1 now 
that
we have them + misc improvements
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  linear algebra     |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |    Reviewers:  Karl-Dieter Crisman
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  
u/nthiery/make_matrix_permute_rows_and_friends_accept_permutations_of_0__n_1_now_that_we_have_them___misc_improvements|
  4feab74aeb7062cda79906523f250eebd859c519
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:11 kcrisman]:
 > I should almost make you wait longer just for the length of your branch
 name!

 :-)

 Most of the name was built by git trac from the summary; I'd been too lazy
 to type this in myself :-)

 > You need to change `\hdots` to `\ldots` for it to work properly in the
 documentation.  Otherwise this is fine.

 Done.

 > Of course, there is the meta-question of whether one should really
 > change this behavior.  Have you talked to anyone else about that?
 > It is indeed backward-compatible but still one might ask whether
 > matrix rows are numbered at 0 or 1... though with Python probably
 > the previous behavior was more wrong than the current one...

 Sage matrices/vectors/... (under the influence of Python) are
 unambiguously indexed by 0..n-1, aren't they? After all that's the
 convention used systematically in all other methods (row, set_row,
 col, __getitem__, ...).

 In this sense, permute_rows and friends were the exceptions. That's
 why I did not bother yet advertising this ticket specifically (beside
 you, Anne, and whoever is following it). We could make a call on
 sage-devel if you think this is really needed.

 Cheers,
                                     Nicolas

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16577#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to