#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers:
Authors: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | ceb3802118125503bd230aae717f2afd01e646c3
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Some notes on the recent commits. Please remove the list brackets in the
`all` statement so it doesn't build the full list, so:
{{{
while not all(s.partner for s in suitors):
}}}
Note in these timings, there is a failure at the first entry:
{{{
sage: L = range(10000)
sage: %timeit all([x for x in L])
1000 loops, best of 3: 758 µs per loop
sage: %timeit all(x for x in L)
100000 loops, best of 3: 3.02 µs per loop
}}}
The added doctests are formatted wrong. The tests themselves need one more
level of indentation and it shoulds be `TESTS::` (mainly 2 colons).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:60>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
