#17030: Knot Theory as a part of GSoC 2014.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: amitjamadagni | Owner: amitjamadagni
Type: task | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: algebraic | Resolution:
topology | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers: Miguel Marco
Authors: Amit Jamadagni, | Work issues:
Miguel Marco | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | e6e17c401b8b879cd041dafc120d3943b3f2dacb
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/amitjamadagni/knots |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> I'll make a more detailed pass through the code after these are
addressed. I also don't know how much of the math I'll be able to review
as I've studied a little knot theory, but possibly not enough to check
everything. Although Miguel could count as the reviewer on that front.
Yeah, I think it would be really wise for such a new component and with a
lot of technicalities for determining e.g. whether a given link is a knot
to have a couple actual knot theorists review it, at least by checking the
output in lots of cases. That may take some cold-calling, though perhaps
a sage-devel email will turn up some all by itself, and there are Sage-
friendly knot folks out there - though I don't know if they know how to
review a branch.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17030#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
