#15916: Tensors on free modules of finite rank
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: egourgoulhon | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: linear algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: free module, | Merged in:
tensor, tensor product | Reviewers:
Authors: Eric Gourgoulhon, | Work issues:
Michal Bejger | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 45aaa975d406ade603a15a34f34a9790936e42ab
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/egourgoulhon/tensor_modules |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by egourgoulhon):
Hi,
* Following Volker's comment, doctests to all underscore methods have been
added. Accordingly `sage -coverage src/sage/tensor/modules` results in
100% coverage.
* Following Travis' one, (i) I've suppressed the spurious mention
"autogenerated file" in the rst files (this resulted from some cut-and-
paste; actually these files are not autogenerated) and (ii) I've moved the
import of tensor/modules to `sage/tensor/all.py`.
Some simple examples illustrating this ticket are on
[http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples/html/SM_tensors_modules.html this
page]. Concrete examples of use in the framework of fields on a smooth
manifold (modules over the algebra of scalar fields on S^2^) are
[http://sagemanifolds.obspm.fr/examples/html/SM_vector_fields_S2.html
here] (this requires #14865).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/15916#comment:26>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
