#14019: equality is broken for Posets
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen             |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  posets             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw,  |    Reviewers:  Travis Scrimshaw,
  Anne Schilling                     |  Anne Schilling
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/combinat/poset/fix_equality-14019|  
68c2902122a52cc16a13831b80d7a52c4e98fe86
   Dependencies:  #17059             |     Stopgaps:  #14185
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by aschilling):

 Hi Nathann,

 I am not quite sure why this is supposed to be wrong. As you wrote the
 output of `canonical_label` of `DiGraph` is
 {{{
 sage: D = digraphs.Path(10)
 sage: D.edges()
 [(0, 1, None),
  (1, 2, None),
  (2, 3, None),
  (3, 4, None),
  (4, 5, None),
  (5, 6, None),
  (6, 7, None),
  (7, 8, None),
  (8, 9, None)]
 sage: D.canonical_label().edges()
 [(0, 9, None),
  (2, 4, None),
  (3, 2, None),
  (4, 6, None),
  (5, 3, None),
  (6, 8, None),
  (7, 5, None),
  (8, 1, None),
  (9, 7, None)]
 }}}
 I do not understand why (the documentation says that this is supposed to
 be unique, but there seems nothing unique about this particular choice to
 me). But with this we obtain
 {{{
 sage: P = Poset(digraphs.Path(10))
 sage: Pp = P.canonical_label()
 sage: Pp.cover_relations()
 [[0, 9], [9, 7], [7, 5], [5, 3], [3, 2], [2, 4], [4, 6], [6, 8], [8, 1]]
 sage: Pp.linear_extension()
 [0, 9, 7, 5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 8, 1]
 }}}
 which is indeed the single linear extension for this poset. If this is not
 the desired output, perhaps someone should rewrite the documentation and
 specify precisely what this *unique* poset is supposed to be. Is it
 supposed to be naturally labelled perhaps? Is that what your problem is?
 It does not say so in the documentation.

 Anne

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14019#comment:59>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to