#14003: Implementation of a rank symmetric test for posets
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
       Reporter:  stumpc5          |        Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement      |       Status:  new
       Priority:  major            |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorics    |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  posets           |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Christian Stump  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A              |  Work issues:
         Branch:                   |       Commit:
   Dependencies:                   |     Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------

Comment (by stumpc5):

 Currently, it is only implemented for ranked posets. This is, for posets
 admitting a rank function that is 0 on minimal elements and an upwards
 cover relations increases the rank by 1.

 More generally, one can define more generally the rank of an element in a
 poset to be the distance  (in the graph sense of the Hasse diagram) to a
 minimal element. For this, every element should be supposed to have finite
 distance. In ranked posets, this is equivalent to the above definition.

 Either way, your disjoint union of two chains of different lengths is
 therefore not rank-symmetric (the rank sizes are 2,2,...,2,1,...,1 with
 the number of 2's being the minimal of the two lengths, and the number of
 1's being max-min.

 I'd (obviously) be happy if you would take over this ticket!

 Thanks, Christian

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14003#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to