#14003: Implementation of a rank symmetric test for posets
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: posets | Merged in:
Authors: Christian Stump | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by jmantysalo):
I am worried about how this should be defined. One possible definition is
that `L=[len(x) for x in P.level_sets()]` equals to `[len(x) for x in
P.dual().level_sets()]`. Another is that `L` equals to `reversed(L)`.
Coding errors are in a sense easy to fix, like giving correct answer.
Wrong definition is like asking wrong question.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/14003#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
