#17216: Poset / LatticePoset: [meet|join]matrix algorithm
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jmantysalo         |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jori Mäntysalo     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jmantysalo/poset___latticeposet___meet_join_matrix_algorithm|  
a7d2dd08623026a269f5fd7700b9e659985e7579
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jmantysalo):

 * status:  new => needs_review
 * milestone:  sage-wishlist => sage-6.4


Old description:

> First, because `meet()` is defined on `LatticePoset`, not on `Poset`, it
> is logical to also move `meet_matrix()` there.
>
> Second, `hasse_diagram.py` contains
>
> {{{
> le = copy(self.lequal_matrix())
> for i in range(n): le[i,i] = 1
> }}}
>
> This is unneeded, because `lequal_matrix()` already contains ones at
> diagonal. We can use `_leq_matrix` directly.
>
> Third, maybe the whole algorithm could be written better.
>
> All this applies dually to `join`.

New description:

 Because `join()` and `meet()` are defined on [meet|join]lattices, not on
 posets, it is logical to also move `join_matrix()` and `meet_matrix()`
 there.

 On `hasse_diagram.py` there is for example

 {{{
 le = copy(self.lequal_matrix())
 for i in range(n): le[i,i] = 1
 }}}

 This is unneeded, because `lequal_matrix()` already contains ones at
 diagonal. We can use `_leq_matrix` directly. There are also few other
 places to small optimization.

 At the same time I suggesg moving `is_lattice()` to `posets.py` from
 category code, because `is_[meet|join]_semilattice()` already is there.

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17216#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to