#16954: Game Theory: Build class for normal form games as well as ability to
obtain
Nash equilibria
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Vince Knight, | Work issues:
James Campbell | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 9e14ff21121029f311b53d608b6a6d826ff2af88
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/vinceknight/finishedresponsetobigreview|
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
> Returning [] wouldn't be quite right from the mathematical point of view
(empty set as opposed to a set that doesn't exist): False seemed to make
more sense to us. Obviously wouldn't make a different from the point of
view of the actual algorithm so let me know if you feel strongly about it.
My suggestion would be to return `None`; this is what we do for crystals
for a similar situation. AFAIK, there is no standard (or other similar
case for that matter) in Sage about this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16954#comment:21>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
