#16954: Game Theory: Build class for normal form games as well as ability to
obtain
Nash equilibria
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Normal Form Games | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Vince Knight, | Work issues:
James Campbell | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 9e14ff21121029f311b53d608b6a6d826ff2af88
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/vinceknight/finishedresponsetobigreview|
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> > > * Since `lrs` is an optional package, will any of the doctests in
the parser file need to be marked optional? I assume not, just checking.
(Maybe the one using the subprocess stuff?)
> >
> > This was indeed an oversight on our part: have added the optional
tests.
>
> Usually our practice is to mark ''only'' the doctest that would actually
fail without the optional package.
Though be sure to do `./sage -t --optional=all` or `--optional=sage,lrs`
in that event, as I [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/doctesting.html
#run-optional-tests just found out], not having done any optional tests in
a while...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16954#comment:28>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
