#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Authors: Vince Knight, | Travis Scrimshaw
James Campbell | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 17748d15c0b0c11044fb7696022d4143fe1056e4
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vinceknight):
Replying to [comment:105 kcrisman]:
> Thanks, looks good. However, I would not be AT ALL surprised if at
least some people have problems with doctests with the ones which have
dicts as output, for the reasons I just mentioned. Like so:
> {{{
> sage: D = {1:2, 2:3} # possibly random order depending on hashing
> sage: sorted(D.items()) # guaranteed
> [(1, 2), (2, 3)]
> }}}
>
> See also #17362.
Ah! That's very helpful: so I should go back and changed the dictionary
outputs to that? I'll do that today at some point.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:106>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
