#16331: Game Theory: Build capacity to solve matching games in to Sage.
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vinceknight | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: game theory | Resolution:
Keywords: Game Theory, | Merged in:
Matching Games, | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman,
Authors: Vince Knight, | Travis Scrimshaw
James Campbell | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 27730d02de114bf1ea38f5b9a099198301fdd188
u/vinceknight/game_theory__build_capacity_to_solve_matching_games_in_to_sage_|
Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Most of these change look great. I think you got too clever in the
examples testing the fix of auto-creating names, though.
{{{
+ sage: suit = {0: (-1, -2),
+ ....: 2: (-2, -2)}
+ sage: revr = {-1: (0, 1),
+ ....: -2: (1, 0)}
...
+ sage: suit = {0: (-1, -2),
+ ....: 1: (-2, -2)}
+ sage: revr = {-1: (0, 1),
+ ....: -3: (1, 0)}
}}}
These preferences sometimes refer to nonexistent players, and sometimes
repeat!
Otherwise probably the eq business is what remains. Nice.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16331#comment:96>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
