#17175: Replace some __cmp__() by rich comparison
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aapitzsch | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.4
Component: misc | Resolution:
Keywords: python3 | Merged in:
Authors: André Apitzsch | Reviewers: R. Andrew Ohana
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/aapitzsch/ticket/17175 | d419515eab7cade4ef3983159d87dd3b10998544
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by wluebbe):
* keywords: => python3
Comment:
Hi André, how did you select the modules from the //mountain// of affected
modules from ticket:16537? Is there a common theme? Just curious!
By the way, after seeing the size of the //cmp//-problem in ticket:16537 I
was so shocked that I stopped working on Sage and Python 3! So this gives
me some fresh motivation ...
What is the reason for explicitly defining all 4 comparisons in
{{{src/sage/dynamics/flat_surfaces/strata.py}}} instead of defining one
(e.g. {{{__gt__}}}) and using the class decorator
{{{functools.total_ordering}}}?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17175#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
