#17175: Replace some __cmp__() by rich comparison
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aapitzsch          |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  misc               |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  python3            |    Merged in:
        Authors:  André Apitzsch     |    Reviewers:  R. Andrew Ohana
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/aapitzsch/ticket/17175           |  d419515eab7cade4ef3983159d87dd3b10998544
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by aapitzsch):

 Replying to [comment:7 wluebbe]:
 > Hi André, how did you select the modules from the //mountain// of
 affected modules from ticket:16537? Is there a common theme? Just curious!

 Up to some exceptions I chose the {{{__cmp__()}}} functions which only
 checked for equality, where I hadn't to implement {{{__gt__()}}} etc.

 > By the way, after seeing the size of the //cmp//-problem in ticket:16537
 I was so shocked that I stopped working on Sage and Python 3! So this
 gives me some fresh motivation ...

 The main "problem" of replacing {{{__cmp__()}}} is pointed out in
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg73051.html.
 Until we find a reasonable solution for it, we should continue with the
 easier tickets, like #16529.

 > What is the reason for explicitly defining all 4 comparisons in
 {{{src/sage/dynamics/flat_surfaces/strata.py}}} instead of defining one
 (e.g. {{{__gt__}}}) and using the class decorator
 {{{functools.total_ordering}}}?

 All comparisons need {{{self._marked_separatrix ==
 other._marked_separatrix}}} and I think this leads to problems with the
 class decorator.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17175#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to