#17375: Maxima should not need a working C compiler to run
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: maxima | Reviewers:
Authors: Peter Bruin | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. No feedback yet. | 203767dd8a46873d41df73693739338cc61d85d6
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/pbruin/17375-maxima_compile |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* cc: vbraun (added)
Comment:
Thanks for the quick diagnosis. I'm trying this right now. For full
testing, someone should test this on a system which does NOT have the
compiler - though I don't know how such a person would get the branch!
(Maybe move gcc after compiling?)
I would almost say this earns a "bug fix only release", at least for the
purpose of making binaries, though unfortunately this branch is based on
beta0. After all, it breaks a lot of calculus! Volker, what do you
think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17375#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
