#17375: Maxima should not need a working C compiler to run
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pbruin | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: packages: | Resolution:
standard | Merged in:
Keywords: maxima | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Peter Bruin | Work issues:
Report Upstream: Reported | Commit:
upstream. No feedback yet. | 203767dd8a46873d41df73693739338cc61d85d6
Branch: | Stopgaps:
u/pbruin/17375-maxima_compile |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
I'm happy with this, it solves the problem of the extra messages and hence
presumably the compiler, passes tests, ''and'' I have tested that moving
the Sage gcc out of the way when this is not applied causes the problem
with `GAZONK` when running `sage -maxima`, but doing so after this branch
is applied causes no problems.
So I think we are cool here. Anything I might have missed? Again, I
think it is quite reasonable to have a bug fix with just this commit
cherry-picked as Sage 6.4.1 (after all, no new spkg needed) while ''also''
including this in the normal Sage 6.5.beta1 so as not to worry about
history.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17375#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.