#17449: deprecate/remove Graph.to_partition and Poset.to_graph
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
ncohen | Status: needs_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.5
defect | Resolution:
Priority: major | Merged in:
Component: graph | Reviewers:
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | a8822900d5d9e428f4fd92d52ed9d00840ef61df
Nathann Cohen | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
u/ncohen/17449 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by tscrim):
Replying to [comment:12 ncohen]:
> Sorry, but I still do not understand why you believe that this function
can be useful to anyone. If it is only to advertise that Posets can be
turned into graphs, isn't `.incomparability_graph` already doing the job ?
It is a different graph than (in)comparability graph, but the `to_graph`
is a natural construction.
> The only new name I can think of is `.undirected_hasse_diagram`, but
with `.hasse_diagram()` around we hardly need it.
Why? Because it's a one-line function? Then we should get rid of more one-
line functions too. Just because you don't see the use, doesn't mean there
isn't one.
> I do not understand why you fight so hard for this. I do not see it.
I don't understand your vendetta against this function either. It doesn't
hurt anyone as it clearly documents what it does.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17449#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
