#17671: Implement xgcd for fraction fields
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  basic arithmetic   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vdelecroix/17671                 |  401193ce270c603dc80ebc1028ff46d0eb662c6c
   Dependencies:  #17673             |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by bruno):

 * In `src/sage/rings/arith.py`, lines 1901-1910, the introducing sentence
 should to my mind be: `Here is an example of a xgcd for two polynomials
 over the integers, where the linear combination is not the gcd but the gcd
 multiplied by the resultant::`.
 {{{#!python

     Here is an example of a xgcd for two polynomials over the integers,
 where the linear
     combination is not the gcd but the resultant::

         sage: R.<x> = ZZ[]
         sage: gcd(2*x*(x-1), x^2)
         x
         sage: xgcd(2*x*(x-1), x^2)
         (2*x, -1, 2)
         sage: (2*(x-1)).resultant(x)
         2
 }}}


 * I do not understand exactly what you want to do with your function
 `_test_gcd_vs_xgcd()`: As discussed, it is not clear that the results
 should always be the same.

 * To answer your questions:
   1. As I've said on sage-devel, I am clearly in favor of `gcd(RR(6),
 RR(3)).parent()` to return `Real Field with 53 bits of precision` rather
 than `Integer Ring`.
   2. I would keep the name `xgcd` though, with a clear documentation.
 ----
 New commits:
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=f22ac97d0f1a45f8c23cf8b9064c0f652b6e6b30
 f22ac97]||{{{trac #17671: (review) fix gcd/xgcd in QuotientFields}}}||
 
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=401193ce270c603dc80ebc1028ff46d0eb662c6c
 401193c]||{{{trac #17671: fix xgcd of polynomial_field_generic}}}||

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17671#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to