#17671: gcd and xgcd over fields, PID and UFD
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: vdelecroix | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.5
Component: basic arithmetic | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Vincent Delecroix | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/vdelecroix/17671 | 1d84c4a9160533338cb19a8df2351cd0fc9d79d0
Dependencies: #17673 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Nope. There seems to be a regression with respect to timings (at least I
do not understand what is happening). If I run the doctest on the file
`coercion_and_categories.rst` in
`$SAGE_ROOT/src/doc/en/thematic_tutorials/` then I end up with an
incredibly long `TestSuite(P).run()`. If I instead replace it with
`TestSuite(P).run(skip='_test_gcd_vs_xgcd')` everything looks fine.
Moreover, in `sage.rings.function_field.function_field.py`, line 62, the
test
{{{
TestSuite(M).run(skip = '_test_gcd_vs_xgcd') # long time (52s on
sage.math, 2012)
}}}
is much longer for me. And if I remove the `skip` then it is even longer!
This is a critical issue.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17671#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
