#17671: gcd and xgcd over fields, PID and UFD
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  basic arithmetic   |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Vincent Delecroix  |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/vdelecroix/17671                 |  c6db5f832b23d29026019de5306472a25e591279
   Dependencies:  #17673, #17675     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Salut Bruno,

 Sorry I had a typo in the two last commit messages so I had to do a forced
 push.

 Now everything looks all right. Note that before setting this one to
 positive review, we need to wait for the trivial #17673 to be in positive
 review (!hint!). Thanks to Ralf #17675 is already in positive review.

 In the last commits:
 - I changed the behavior for real numbers as you and I wanted (nobody
 answered on the [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-
 devel/37TjI2fZfLM sage-devel thread]).
 - I made one change to `_test_gcd_vs_xgcd` in order to check whether the
 parent of gcd is really what we expect and not an element of another ring.

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17671#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to