#17573: Wrap Gap Structure Description
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: | Owner:
kcrisman | Status: positive_review
Type: | Milestone: sage-6.5
enhancement | Resolution:
Priority: minor | Merged in:
Component: group | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen
theory | Work issues:
Keywords: | Commit:
Authors: | 294041b72adf4b10f44f913d7439c33c96524eee
Sergey Bykov | Stopgaps:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Branch: |
public/17573 |
Dependencies: |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
> Everything is impossible to compute once you increase the problem size
too far.
You are oversimplifying. Some finitely presented groups can be described
very easily in either Sage or Gap, and this function can be called quickly
too. Turning them into a permutation group is a very bad move.
> > I personally consider this bad design
>
> this = consistent interfaces and specialized implementations in
subclasses?
Calling non implemented or broken functions, and saying that "it is
somebody else's problem"
{{{
It is then up to author of that particular group to override
structure_description.
}}}
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17573#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
