#17464: Computing the automorphism group of a graph with Bliss
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner:
Type: | Status: needs_work
enhancement | Milestone: sage-6.5
Priority: major | Resolution:
Component: graph | Merged in:
theory | Reviewers:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Authors: | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | cac03d7f9ce6ee3de47ad48f46a9118fb0c72083
Branch: | Stopgaps:
public/bliss |
Dependencies: |
#17552 |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by azi):
Replying to [comment:79 ncohen]:
> > What I *think* I did is simply made sure the Tutte program uses sage's
algorithm so that the test passes on installations not having bliss
installed.
>
> Yes. But as you changed Sage's source code and not only its doctests,
now `tutte_polynomial` will never be able to use bliss even if it is
installed.
Right, good point!
>
> > As I understand you'd like to have a new parameter for the tutte poly
to use bliss?
>
> That is one way out. Another way out is to remove the doctest if it is
not actually necessary, or to modify it in such a way that it still tests
what it should test, without actually printing the ordering that may
depend upon the packages installed.
Unless you start raving I'll just remove the specific doctest - I don't
think its releant.
Thanks,
Jernej
>
> Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17464#comment:80>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
