#17695: Slightly fasten is_cyclotomic()
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  bruno              |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor              |    Milestone:  sage-6.5
      Component:  number theory      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  cyclotomic         |    Merged in:
  polynomials                        |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Bruno Grenet       |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  f79eeaaa630b1bd966a25a2f7b0f7a5f1dda3378
  u/bruno/slightly_fasten_is_cyclotomic__|     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by bruno):

 Replying to [comment:6 vdelecroix]:
 > Replying to [comment:5 bruno]:
 > > Replying to [comment:3 vdelecroix]:
 > > It is not surprising indeed that Pari is faster for this. I don't
 understand what you mean by
 > > > either call Pari or stick to their implementation.
 > > Do you mean there are two ways to use Pari's implementation?
 >
 > Nope. Either we should copy their implementation within Sage (I do not
 think this is justified) or just call Pari.
 >
 > And by the way there are two ways of using pari. Either with `gp` (this
 is a pexpect interface with a lot of latency in communication) and with
 `libpari` (which is very efficient in C). But sadly there is not yet
 `poliscyclo` and `poliscycloprod` in the libpari interface (i.e. in the
 file `libs/pari/gen.pyx`). I guess that we should wait for #17631 and not
 modify `gen.pyx` directly.
 >
 > Vincent


 For concreteness, what do you propose to do now? If I understand
 correctly, you propose to wait for #17631 and then make `is_cyclotomic()`
 directly call the pari functions, and not introduce the tiny change I
 made? I am fine with that, just wanted to be sure!

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17695#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to