#17867: Risk of confusion between LPProblem and MixedIntegerLinearProgram
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: linear | Resolution:
programming | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/17867 | 9ab6ea2b4c79e0aa04ccd6a5d6ba2a7e34b78fcd
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Could you make a reference in the doc of `MixedIntegerLinearProgramming`
toward `InteractiveLPProblem`? People might be delighted to have an
interactive object to learn more about the black box! Though it is only
about float linear programming isn't it?
And (not for this ticket) it would be cool if the arguments were
compatible: namely `variable_type` being either `<=`, `>=` or the empty
string in `ILPP` versus the argument `nonnegative=True` in `MILP`.
`problem_type` in `ILPP` versus `maximization=True` in `MILP`, etc.
Wouldn't it?
And last but not the least: we can use the class `ILPP` to cross check the
validity of (float) `MILP` and vice-versa.
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17867#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
