#17867: Risk of confusion between LPProblem and MixedIntegerLinearProgram
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: linear | Resolution:
programming | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/17867 | 5b98d3d61c7b13d89d73dea09947f81d4f9e61be
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hello,
> Could you make a reference in the doc of `MixedIntegerLinearProgramming`
toward `InteractiveLPProblem`?
Done.
> People might be delighted to have an interactive object to learn more
about the black box! Though it is only about float linear programming
isn't it?
I expect.
> And (not for this ticket) it would be cool if the arguments were
compatible: namely `variable_type` being either `<=`, `>=` or the empty
string in `ILPP` versus the argument `nonnegative=True` in `MILP`.
`problem_type` in `ILPP` versus `maximization=True` in `MILP`, etc.
Wouldn't it?
Possibly. I never read the code of `interactive_simplex_method`.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17867#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
