#17867: Risk of confusion between LPProblem and MixedIntegerLinearProgram
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: linear | Resolution:
programming | Merged in:
Keywords: | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: public/17867 | 9ab6ea2b4c79e0aa04ccd6a5d6ba2a7e34b78fcd
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by dimpase):
Replying to [comment:5 vdelecroix]:
>
> And last but not the least: we can use the class `ILPP` to cross check
the validity of (float) `MILP` and vice-versa.
I mentioned some time ago that there is a way to get proper certificates
of optimality/infeasibility for LPs (cf Farkas lemma, etc), and it ought
to be in Sage...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17867#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
