#17905: Dominating set in directed Graphs not correct
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: Mantis | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: dominating_set, | Merged in:
Graphs, Directed Graphs | Reviewers: David Coudert,
Authors: Sergios Lenis | Nathann Cohen
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: public/17905 | Commit:
Dependencies: | 5e2de2d29888559935c58a4b48db89e5c3fcba6f
| Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by Mantis):
* commit: 7d0c749b1eb9d1b208f53c9b3a99ecaec16ee1bb =>
5e2de2d29888559935c58a4b48db89e5c3fcba6f
* branch: u/Mantis/dominating_set_in_directed_graphs_not_correct =>
public/17905
Comment:
Hello,
It seems my first walk-through is near the end. I agree with David that a
space is missing between graphs and (.
It's better like this:
{{{The dominating set is calculated for both the directed and undirected
graphs (modification introduced in :trac:`17905`)::}}}
Sergios
----
New commits:
||[http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/commit/?id=5e2de2d29888559935c58a4b48db89e5c3fcba6f
5e2de2d]||{{{trac #17905: Small simplification}}}||
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17905#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
