#18003: Implement Fully Packed Loop class
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: kdilks | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: fpl, ncp, days64, | Merged in:
asm, lp, fully packed loop | Reviewers: Jessica Striker,
Authors: jcampbell | Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/18003 | 0cbd4f6d2306e42b2e801c05ca81f2699df35a2d
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by egunawan):
I believe this is ready to be reviewed by Travis?
I added the equality functionality. I wanted to do a test like
isinstance(other,FullyPackedLoop), but I did not because of this behavior
which I don't understand:
sage: A=AlternatingSignMatrices(3)
sage: M=A.random_element()
sage: f=FullyPackedLoop(M)
sage: type(f)
<class 'sage.combinat.fully_packed_loop.FullyPackedLoop'>
sage: isinstance(f,FullyPackedLoop)
False
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18003#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
