#17956: Put back stopgap for IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/stopgap_for_partitions_compositions|
df36580013de99675ecd3899a31945af27d818eb
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Old description:
> Since `Partitions` and `Compositions` are just wrappers around
> `IntegerListsLex`, they inherit all the known bugs of that function, see
> #17548. Therefore, those functions should also use
> `IntegerListsLexPublic` with the stopgap from #17898.
New description:
As shown in #17548, there are still plenty of bugs in `Partitions` and
`Compositions`, so we should undo the `IntegerListsLexPublic` stuff
introduced in #17898,
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17956#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
