#17956: Put back stopgap for IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
u/jdemeyer/stopgap_for_partitions_compositions|
df36580013de99675ecd3899a31945af27d818eb
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by jdemeyer:
Old description:
> As shown in #17548, there are still plenty of bugs in `Partitions` and
> `Compositions`, so we should undo the `IntegerListsLexPublic` stuff
> introduced in #17898,
New description:
As shown in #17548, there are still plenty of bugs in `Partitions` and
`Compositions`, so we should undo the `IntegerListsLexPublic` stuff
introduced in #17898.
For a real solution to the problem with `IntegerListsLex`, see #17920 and
#17979.
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17956#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.