#17956: Put back stopgap for IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer           |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:                     |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer     |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  u/jdemeyer/stopgap_for_partitions_compositions|  
df36580013de99675ecd3899a31945af27d818eb
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by jdemeyer:

Old description:

> As shown in #17548, there are still plenty of bugs in `Partitions` and
> `Compositions`, so we should undo the `IntegerListsLexPublic` stuff
> introduced in #17898,

New description:

 As shown in #17548, there are still plenty of bugs in `Partitions` and
 `Compositions`, so we should undo the `IntegerListsLexPublic` stuff
 introduced in #17898.

 For a real solution to the problem with `IntegerListsLex`, see #17920 and
 #17979.

--

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17956#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to