#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues: support n in an
Report Upstream: N/A | iterable
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | e03611509b03f79e1c55b2cc347a427fc51a9f51
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:69 bgillespie]:
> Replying to [comment:36 jdemeyer]:
> > Is this really true?
> > {{{
> > Before trac#17979 the indexing was ambiguous and sometimes started at
1.
> > }}}
> There were places in the code of the old integer_list.py that used
either convention, and integer_vector.py consistently started indexing at
1.
Sorry, my bad: actually the 1-based indexing was only used internally in
the old ``IntegerListLex``. I removed that comment.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:94>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
