#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues: support n in an
Report Upstream: N/A | iterable
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | e03611509b03f79e1c55b2cc347a427fc51a9f51
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:51 jdemeyer]:
> What is `IntegerVectors` and why is it not an alias of
`IntegerListsLex`?
Essentially it's a short hand for `IntegerListsLex` when the length is
fixed. Kind of like Partitions is a short hand for `IntegerListsLex` when
`min_part=1` and `max_slope=0`. It also adds some more methods, and
specialized counting. In any case, this ticket is not really touching this
class except for its interface to `IntegerListsLex`.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:95>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.