#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Work issues:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |       Commit:
         Branch:                     |  39d1993d70a837967109be12de261f4f504901cc
  public/ticket/17979                |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Replying to [comment:53 jdemeyer]:
 > Please use `Infinity` instead of `infinity` such that, if we ever use
 `Infinity` from `sage.rings.infinity`, we don't need to change `infinity`
 to `Infinity` everywhere.

 I just changed `infinity` to `_infinity` to mark that we are currently
 doing something special; it's a one line change at the begining of the
 file to switch to `_infinity=Infinity` when the later will be optimized
 (looking forward to it). That being said, I don't mind changing
 `_infinity` to `Infinity` in the code if you think this won't bring
 confusion.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:101>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to