#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 3530b5383cb02406034f6a1c8ffa2de50f777455
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
> I was just wondering what the new code couldn't do that the old one
handled.
Basicaclly just the `next` and `prev` features. There is a single spot
using `next` in the Sage library (in `Compositions` IIRC), and I doubt
they are much used elsewhere.
`next` should be rather straightforward to implement if someone needs it.
I created #18058 for this.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:126>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
