#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers:
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Commit:
Branch: | 8e51e7ba310308d0ef8787519986d01ca24bc79e
public/ticket/17979 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Description changed by nthiery:
Old description:
> As documented in #17548, #17956, #17920, there are several bugs in
> !IntegerListsLex which also have implications for !Partitions and
> !Compositions. This branch reimplements !IntegerListsLex.
>
> See also #18055 and #18056 for followups.
New description:
As documented in #17548, #17956, #17920, there are several bugs in
!IntegerListsLex which also have implications for !Partitions and
!Compositions. This branch reimplements !IntegerListsLex.
See also #18055 and #18056 for followups.
Remaining design points:
- Do we want to keep the feature that after `min_length`, lists are
"considered up to trailing zeroes".
- Renaming all the attributes (`.floor`, ...) to private attributes
- Double check to logic for improper lexicographic iterability detection
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:131>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
