#16819: Implement categories for Lie algebras
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  tscrim             |        Owner:  tscrim
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.4
      Component:  categories         |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  lie algebras       |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw   |    Reviewers:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/categories/lie_algebras-16819|  
c893945b300c3157485d4094fd2e72eadb65935d
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 The `is_field` can be removed; that was a holdover from when I first made
 this a subcategory of `MagmaticAlgebras`. Also we should separate the test
 for antisymmetry from the Jacobi as this gives more information when
 `TestSuite` fails.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16819#comment:36>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to