#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 9278051dd34ba2c5967ef191d0c9ca9e124275cf
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:253 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:252 nthiery]:
> > Do you see any real use case?
> I certainly have no use case. It just seems a bit strange to allow every
possible value for `min_slope` except `+Infinity`.
>
> At least make it a `ValueError` if `min_slope=Infinity` or
`max_slope=-Infinity` is given.
Oh, I see your point now. I somehow thought this was already checked for.
Done now: if `min_slope` is not `-oo`, then it's converted to an integer.
Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:259>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
