#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 3f534ca86284b0cebb461c2e0a45a7eb74de7543
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:297 jdemeyer]:
> Adding extra conditions breaks things:
> {{{
> sage: IntegerListsLex(ceiling=[2], floor=[4]).list() # good!
> [[]]
> sage: IntegerListsLex(7, ceiling=[2], floor=[4]).list()
> ...
> ValueError: Could not check that the specified constraints yield a
finite set
> }}}
Oops, sorry, my mistake. I had put the test in the wrong spot. This part
should be fixed now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:302>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
