#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | 4b4c54e075e768ba24186583d4ba033419982cba
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:299 jdemeyer]:
> This is one more example which currently does not work:
> {{{
> sage: IntegerListsLex(length=1, max_slope=0, min_slope=1).list()
> }}}
The current output is correct, isn't it? [Infinity] would be the output in
inverse lexicographic order, which results in the error message that m is
unbounded.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:312>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
