#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/17979                |  4b4c54e075e768ba24186583d4ba033419982cba
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:312 aschilling]:
 > Replying to [comment:299 jdemeyer]:
 > > This is one more example which currently does not work:
 > > {{{
 > > sage: IntegerListsLex(length=1, max_slope=0, min_slope=1).list()
 > > }}}
 >
 > The current output is correct, isn't it? [Infinity] would be the output
 in inverse lexicographic order, which results in the error message that m
 is unbounded.

 Sorry, I obviously meant
 {{{
 sage: IntegerListsLex(length=2, max_slope=0, min_slope=1).list()
 }}}
 which should have an empty output.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:314>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to