#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling         |        Owner:
           Type:  defect             |       Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  blocker            |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  combinatorics      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  days64             |    Merged in:
        Authors:  Bryan Gillespie,   |    Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
  Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery  |  Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  Work issues:
         Branch:                     |       Commit:
  public/ticket/17979                |  3e3c7f6075e3b673911eb22faf427b0fb2a17b87
   Dependencies:                     |     Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by jdemeyer):

 Replying to [comment:354 nthiery]:
 > Also, at this point, we are speaking about
 > 5-6 lines of code that are duplicated very locally.
 It's more than that and it can only get worse if more features are added
 to `Envelope`.

 > and the code would be less straightforward.
 I disagree with this. I think code duplication is always a high risk for
 bugs.

 Anyway, I implemented this in this last commit.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:360>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to