#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | e151d78ea32b9cac2047e2faff3247bdcce1f5d5
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:403 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:391 nthiery]:
> > I pretty much trust that the code gives correct result.
> To be clear: during all my testing I didn't find a single example where
the code actually returned a wrong result. On the other hand, there were
many hangs or cases where a superfluous `ValueError` was raised.
This indeed is how I had interpreted your comments. Thanks for confirming!
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:404>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
