#17979: Reimplementation of IntegerListsLex
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: aschilling | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: days64 | Merged in:
Authors: Bryan Gillespie, | Reviewers: Nathann Cohen, Jeroen
Anne Schilling, Nicolas M. Thiery | Demeyer, Travis Scrimshaw
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: | Commit:
public/ticket/17979 | e151d78ea32b9cac2047e2faff3247bdcce1f5d5
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:407 jdemeyer]:
> I personally have no further comments regarding this ticket. I have
tested it ''a lot'' in practice, trying hard to break it.
To say the least!
> I have read most of the structural code, but not the actual algorithm. I
would agree with a positive_review for this ticket
Thanks for the hard work :-)
> ''except'' for the changes to `integer_vector.py`.
Yup. Note for the release manager: those were checked and validated by
Travis and Anne.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/17979#comment:409>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
