#16477: implement Dirichlet series
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
       Reporter:  rws                |        Owner:
           Type:  enhancement        |       Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major              |    Milestone:  sage-6.6
      Component:  number theory      |   Resolution:
       Keywords:  moebius, zeta,     |    Merged in:
  sigma, euler_phi, euler            |    Reviewers:
        Authors:  Jonathan Hanke,    |  Work issues:  use pari, g.f. input
  Ralf Stephan                       |       Commit:
Report Upstream:  N/A                |  5698ef17c2be57ebe3826737cdba43f12c6bb8d6
         Branch:  u/rws/16477-1      |     Stopgaps:
   Dependencies:                     |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------

Comment (by vdelecroix):

 Hello,

 Replying to [comment:39 rws]:
 > Replying to [comment:38 vdelecroix]:
 >
 > > 2. Why is this new module in `sage.modular`? It makes no sense.
 > The Dirichlet characters are there too. I don't see why not.

 Because `sage.modular` is intended for modular forms. A Dirichlet serie is
 not necessarily a modular form. To me, modules and submodules should work
 by inclusion. Or at least try to.

 I do not see Dirichlet series as a subset of modular forms. I perfectly
 understand the reason why it is here, but it would be better in
 `sage.functions` or `sage.rings`. The directory `sage.modular` really
 contains too much stuff. This is historical as people that initiated Sage
 were very interested in modular forms.

 > > 3. You should try harder to use `pari` and not `gp`. Since #17631,
 most functions are available directly in `pari`.
 > But not those needing closures, see comment:16 and #18038

 I see! Do you mind adding a comment in the docstring saying that as soon
 as #18038 is ready, this can be modified?

 > > 5. What is the purpose of the commented code?
 > I didn't want to erase useful ideas of the original author.

 Why letting it commented then?

 Vincent

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16477#comment:40>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to