#16477: implement Dirichlet series
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: rws | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.6
Component: number theory | Resolution:
Keywords: moebius, zeta, | Merged in:
sigma, euler_phi, euler | Reviewers:
Authors: Jonathan Hanke, | Work issues: use pari, g.f. input
Ralf Stephan | Commit:
Report Upstream: N/A | 5698ef17c2be57ebe3826737cdba43f12c6bb8d6
Branch: u/rws/16477-1 | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Replying to [comment:40 vdelecroix]:
> Hello,
>
> Replying to [comment:39 rws]:
> > Replying to [comment:38 vdelecroix]:
> >
> > > 2. Why is this new module in `sage.modular`? It makes no sense.
> > The Dirichlet characters are there too. I don't see why not.
>
> Because `sage.modular` is intended for modular forms. A Dirichlet serie
is not necessarily a modular form. To me, modules and submodules should
work by inclusion. Or at least try to.
>
> I do not see Dirichlet series as a subset of modular forms. I perfectly
understand the reason why it is here, but it would be better in
`sage.functions` or `sage.rings`. The directory `sage.modular` really
contains too much stuff. This is historical as people that initiated Sage
were very interested in modular forms.
What do you think of `sage.lfunctions`?
Vincent
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16477#comment:41>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
