#18228: Developer guide: Do not change tickets with status "positive_review"
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/cheuberg/doc | Commit:
/do-not-change-positive-review- | e18c88688732d8d26ff3fc4a0723d14e8a37cf16
tickets | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Hello,
> > This however, would still mean that he would run tests of a branch
*before* noticing that the branch has changed.
>
> As outlined by Volker in the sage-devel thread, this might lead to an
infinite loop.
`O_o`
Are you answering to the procedure I explained above ? It can clearly be
implemented with a 'if'.
> If you convince the release manager to do that, I'll happily set modify
this branch to include the proposed semantics.
If you insist on changing the rules, please open a sage-devel thread
explaining its consequences: no last-minute typo/bugfix, and no way to set
to `needs_work` a ticket in `positive_review`. I am personally against it.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18228#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
