#18228: Developer guide: Do not change tickets with status "positive_review"
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: cheuberg | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-6.7
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Merged in:
Authors: Clemens Heuberger | Reviewers:
Report Upstream: N/A | Work issues:
Branch: u/cheuberg/doc | Commit:
/do-not-change-positive-review- | e18c88688732d8d26ff3fc4a0723d14e8a37cf16
tickets | Stopgaps:
Dependencies: |
-------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ncohen):
* status: needs_review => needs_info
Comment:
Hello Clemens,
> Concerning your second point: *I* do not insist on changing the rules. I
have opened a sage-devel thread, linked above. Several suggestions, some
of them similar to yours, have been made by several people, but the
release manager did not show any indication of changing his point of view
that a ticket with positive review must not be changed.
>
> I think that the issue has to be resolved as the 7 tickets show.
Therefore, as the easiest solution, I propose this ticket.
I believe that a branch like yours shouldn't be accepted without a poll on
sage-devel. You should explain the change that you want to make, your
reasons for doing so, and the consequences that you are aware of.
Thanks,
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18228#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.